Our mission is to educate and inspire farmers, ranchers, and consumers about the importance of sustainability, regenerative farming, and biodiversity in our food systems.

In the world of cosmetics and food preservation, there are silent, synthetic culprits lurking within our everyday products - BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) and BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene). These closely related synthetic antioxidants play the role of preservatives, not only in our favorite lipsticks and moisturizers but also in the food we consume daily. While they might appear harmless at first glance, a closer examination reveals a disturbing truth about the potential health and environmental hazards associated with these compounds.

The impact of BHA and BHT on human health is an area of growing concern. One of the immediate dangers lies in the potential for these chemicals to induce allergic reactions when applied to the skin. The implications of these allergic responses on the long-term health of individuals remain a topic of ongoing research.

Perhaps even more concerning is the classification of BHA as a possible human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This ominous label raises questions about the safety of using products that contain BHA, especially when applied to the skin or consumed over extended periods.

Furthermore, BHA has found itself on the European Commission on Endocrine Disruption's list as a Category 1 priority substance. This categorization stems from mounting evidence suggesting that BHA interferes with hormone function. Such interference can have far-reaching consequences on the body's delicate hormonal balance and may lead to various health issues.

The dangers of BHA and BHT extend beyond human health and into the environment. These chemicals pose a significant threat to aquatic organisms due to their toxicity. Under the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, BHA is designated as a chemical of potential concern. This designation is a testament to its ability to harm aquatic life and its potential to accumulate in the environment.

Similarly, the United Nations Environment Program has highlighted BHT's moderate to high potential for bioaccumulation in aquatic species. Though BHT is considered safe for human consumption, its impact on marine ecosystems cannot be ignored. The potential for these chemicals to disrupt the delicate balance of aquatic ecosystems is a grave concern.

The regulation of BHA and BHT varies across the globe, with some countries taking more stringent measures to protect their citizens and the environment. In Canada, the use of these chemicals in cosmetics is largely unrestricted, although Health Canada has identified BHA as a "high human health priority" due to concerns regarding its carcinogenicity. BHT, on the other hand, is categorized as a "moderate human health priority." Both compounds have been flagged for future assessment under Canada's Chemicals Management Plan.

In contrast, the European Union has banned the use of BHA as a fragrance ingredient in cosmetics. The State of California has gone even further, mandating warning labels on products containing BHA, informing consumers about its potential to cause cancer.

BHA and BHT, once seen as harmless additives in cosmetics and food products, are now raising significant concerns regarding their impact on human health and the environment. With mounting evidence of their potential carcinogenicity and disruption of hormonal function, it is imperative that consumers are informed about the risks associated with these synthetic antioxidants. Additionally, efforts to regulate and restrict their use should be expanded to protect both individuals and the delicate ecosystems of our planet. In a world where awareness is key to making informed choices, it is essential that we remain vigilant and discerning when it comes to the products we use daily.